Jan Šinágl angažovaný občan, nezávislý publicista

Mgr. Straka: "Even if perhaps the court still thought that the defendant had actually done something to the victim, it could not be battery within the meaning of the Criminal Code. At most, it might be a misdemeanor of some sort, but not one that could be resolved in a criminal court...."

***

Today was the 14th main hearing in my criminal case of "bodily harm". Mr. Jan Šinágl was again not allowed into the courtroom.

For an act I did not commit, I was sentenced today after 4 years and 8 days to a total of 15 months' imprisonment suspended for a probationary period of 30 months.

Full story>  https://www.deepl.com/translator

I'm unpunished, I'm over 40 and I have Jewish roots. I have never committed a crime or offence that could smack of Nazi sympathies. There's not a shred of evidence for that. Yet I have been convicted quite harshly for it, even without a trial.

The criminal investigator himself even asked me repeatedly outside the office who I had stepped on, that he did not understand what was going on on the part of the prosecutor's office and that he had not experienced this during his career. He even said that he absolutely did not understand how the prosecutor could so incomprehensibly change my charge and extend it to the offence of Nazi sympathies without any basis from the police!

The public prosecutor supervises the legality of the pre-trial criminal proceedings BUT FEW PEOPLE KNOW THAT in addition to the case file - the criminal file, which you have the right to see, the public prosecutor's office also keeps a so-called supervisory file, where there are other documents relating to the investigation and your person. You will not be allowed to see this file, you have no right to look at it, or to know what its contents are, and in exceptional cases the same prosecutor who supervises your case decides whether you can look at it. Are you clear what this means for your rights?

In the final scene of the Coen brothers' black comedy "Burn After Reading", the astonished head of the CIA responds to the whirlwind of absurd situations, confusion and chaos unleashed by "amateur spies" by instructing his subordinate: "Report back to me when it makes sense."

***

We have already reported on this website about the ruling of the Prague-East Court of Justice of 15 March 2024, by which Judge Lucie Řezáčová deprived a caring and loving mother of the possibility to raise her two young children (4.5 and 6.5 years old), by de facto entrusting them to the exclusive care of their father. He will have custody of them for 26 days in a 35-day cycle, while the mother will only have custody for 9 days, i.e. 3 extended weekends.

The social worker (OSPOD Brandýs n. L.) also found this verdict insufficient and initially proposed exemplary punishment for the mother (who left a toxic environment with the children due to domestic violence). Namely - the mother would be allowed to have contact with her children once every 14 days from Thursday to Sunday and the following week 1-2 hours on a single weekday. The court softened the verdict somewhat, calling it, in a charming way, "alternating asymmetrical custody".

Full Article in Czech>

***

An asymmetrical judgment totally against common sense and against children !

Judge JUDr. Jana Bochňáková has once again banned two journalists from attending a public court hearing, mediating a verbal message by a judicial guard. Again, no factual, legal justification, with a ban on entering the courtroom - before the court session began and after it ended. The judge is flagrantly violating the Constitution of the Czech Republic, the right of the public to participate in public court proceedings, to exercise control over them, including attacking freedom of speech, the press and encouraging censorship.

The next meeting is scheduled for April 25, 2024 at 8:00 a.m. In the matter of defamation by Bogdalík, convicted 3 times, on 2.4.2024 at 11:00 a.m. Let's hope that his "partner" from the NCOZ (National Centre for the Fight against Organized Crime) Ostrava, Colonel Jaromír Šigut, will also appear.

Full article in Czech>

... Stauber rannte weiter. Vosáhlo befahl daher Slavik, ebenfalls zu schießen. Slavik gab zwei kurze Schüsse aus seinem Maschinengewehr ab, woraufhin Stauber zu Boden ging, aber auch danach stieß er sich mit den Beinen ab und bewegte sich in den Wald. Die Patrouille lief auf Stauber zu, Vosáhlo zog seine Dienstpistole und feuerte aus weniger als 2 Metern Entfernung ein ganzes Magazin auf den am Boden liegenden Stauber ab - insgesamt 8 Schüsse. Stauber war auf der Stelle tot....

Am 22. Oktober 1949 arbeitete Franz Stauber (geb. 1919), ein westdeutscher Staatsbürger, mit anderen Waldarbeitern auf der bayerischen Seite der Staatsgrenze. Nach Angaben der Grenzwacht war Stauber jedoch in die Tschechoslowakei eingereist.

Deshalb hielt ihn die Streife etwa 2 Meter von der Staatsgrenze entfernt fest und wollte ihn auf die Wache in Maxovo bringen. Stauber trug ein paar kleine Scheine bei sich, war aber nicht bewaffnet.

Where would we be if persons with their noses and mouths uncovered were corseting our cemeteries !

***

Another example of the "activities" of these obvious psychopaths. On 3.3.2021, as the only representative of the public, I said goodbye to my friend Colonel v.v. Josef Musil. An unbelievable anabasis began, which was concluded only on 31.5.2023. See what all one photograph, without a veil and in the open air without people, i.e. in public without the public, caused - in the PROTOCOL of the insight into the file. How many hours did the officials have to spend on this and how much money did it cost the taxpayers! Already PK Hořovice should have postponed it, when the photo itself is proof of the senselessness of the denunciation and deliberate harassment by the MM Agency.

Already two days after the farewell at the Pardubice Crematorium (5.3.2021), the MM Agency reacted by filing a complaint for violation of the law and endangering the population by not wearing a veil. It was not until 31.5.2023 that I learned from the entire offence file the name of the informer Mgr. Jana Gavlasová in the study room of the KHS Pardubice, i.e. only after more than two years when I was denied the right to study the entire offence file by the KHS Pardubice. Interestingly, the Communication of the Ministry of Health dated 24.1.2023, from the end of which I quote:

... In conclusion, the Ministry states that it has investigated the manner in which the complainant's complaint was dealt with as set out in the KHS letter No. KHSPA 13345/2021/R-Pce, dated 11.8.2021, and for the reasons stated above, it found the complaint to be partially justified. The KHS was required to keep the order of the MoI on file under file No. S-KHSPA 05097/2021 and should have issued an order under Section 38(5) of the Administrative Procedure Code on the denial of inspection of a part of the file, or allowed the complainant to inspect the order of the MoI in such a way that the identity of the whistleblower of the alleged offence was protected at the same time.

Hello, sir,

I'd like to make an appointment. We've been litigating for 14 years over 40cm². No, it's not a mistake. Now we have to remove the building. It's a piece of land that's on our property, where the neighbour has no access. It was all the fault of the building authority. The neighbour first agreed, it was built - and changed the decision. It was the fault of the building authority, who sent us a demolition letter yesterday. This investment would be 550,000 kc, against his 500 kc. Our neighbour also destroyed a 500,000 kc fence on our property. And again, 2 experts with 2 different opinions. The judge said, "What's my point?" "Justice". He said, "There is no justice, and don't look for it in court." I'm already in bad health. Now I've been diagnosed with cancer. Two months of radiation, what happens next is in the stars. I'm so desperate I don't want to live. I'm begging for an appointment. Too much!!! I'll tell you who it is and why the court always sends us crazy. We have exhausted all remedies, but we have not been able to achieve a positive result. Now we have one last option - the European Court of Human Rights.

Married couple Helena and Zdeněk Petrů, 2.6.2023

It is a pity that the article on Seznam.cz: Murder in Slopney was only short time on the front page? It was not mentioned in court that the victim was alleged to have modified weapons for the Slovak mafia, specifically adding silencers, also for Czech policemen?! I wonder who is interested in keeping the innocent in prison? Slovak Maroš Straňák and Czech David Šimon, with sentences of 24.5 and 20.5 years respectively, have been in prison for 11 years. Czech TV had two teams on the scene (supposedly important, editors told me) - no mention in the evening's CT Events ?! I wonder who has the power to arrange or order it!

The investigation into the murder of Miroslav Sedlář in 2011, also greatly complicated the actions of the descendants of the murdered man. First they reported that he fell down the stairs, then they cleaned up the house and the footprints... It cannot be ruled out that he modified the weapon used to murder journalist Ján Kuciak and his girlfriend for the Slovak mafia. The judge of the KS Zlín, Radomír Koudela, first acquitted the convicts in 2013, and in 2014 he gave them exceptional sentences. Milan Rakaš - the prosecution's crown witness - appeared in 2014 and claimed that Straňák had confessed to the murder to him while in custody... Jakub Řezníček - originally a suspect, then a witness - claimed that on the day of Sedlář's murder he had sat in the car with Šimon and Straňák and that he had sat there wearing a balaclava and gloves. It was there that police dogs identified his scent traces. The convicts refused his testimony, as did the fourth passenger. Pavel Kucik, the lead investigator of the murder, told reporters that Reznicek's statement was purposeful. But he never told the court. Tomáš Botek - told reporters that he did not meet Šimon and Straňák until about a month after the murder in Slopný - in October. His words are consistent with the telecommunications data.

Full article in Czech>