Jan Šinágl angažovaný občan, nezávislý publicista

   

Strojový překlad

Nejnovější komentáře

  • 26.05.2022 18:17
    Traduje se, že před odjezdem do Československa si nechal ...

    Read more...

     
  • 26.05.2022 18:10
    Co jsme dlužni nejen Emerichu Rathovi? V roce 2004 prošel ...

    Read more...

     
  • 26.05.2022 18:05
    Fotky: Putin a Zelenskyj mezi zraněnými. Jeden v pohovu, druhý ...

    Read more...

     
  • 26.05.2022 15:18
    Zdravím vás pánové, tak přestože jsem myslel, že rozsudkem ...

    Read more...

     
  • 26.05.2022 10:15
    Lidé už si protokolární dary neprohlédnou. Fiala ukončil ...

    Read more...

     
  • 22.05.2022 11:03
    Bezprostředně před tímto historickým zlomem napsal Havel ...

    Read more...


Portál sinagl.cz byl vybrán do projektu WebArchiv

logo2
Ctění čtenáři, rádi bychom vám oznámili, že váš oblíbený portál byl vyhodnocen jako kvalitní zdroj informací a stránky byly zařazeny Národní knihovnou ČR do archivu webových stránek v rámci projektu WebArchiv.

Citát dne

„Komunismus znamená v pravém a úplném smyslu bludné učení, že nikdo nemá míti žádné jmění, nýbrž aby všechno bylo společné, a každý dostával jenom část zaslouženou a potřebnou k jeho výživě. – Bez všelijakých důkazů a výkladů vidí tedy hned na první pohled každý, že takové učení jest nanejvýš bláznovské, a že se mohlo jen vyrojiti z hlav několika pomatených lidí, kteří by vždy z člověka chtěli učiniti něco buď lepšího neb horšího, ale vždy něco jiného než je člověk.“

Karel Havlíček Borovský ve svém časopise „SLOVAN“ 26.7.1850


SVOBODA  NENÍ  ZADARMO

„Lepší je být zbytečně vyzbrojen než beze zbraní bezmocný.“

Díky za dosavadní finanční podporu mé činnosti.

Po založení SODALES SOLONIS o.s., uvítáme podporu na číslo konta:
Raiffeisen Bank - 68689/5500
IBAN CZ 6555 0000000000000 68689
SWIFT: RZBCCZPP
Jan Šinágl,
předseda SODALES SOLONIS o.s.

Login Form

English articles

Pribram hrob Fortyn 2022Pribram hrob napis Fortyn 2022 Doc. Ing. Vladimír Kalina about the method of cancer treatment of MUDr. Karel Fortýn.

***

He did not see the implementation of his groundbreaking method of cancer treatment by devitalization. The method was reliable, safe, fast and effective. It had only one drawback - it was cheap, and in this it was dangerous that it was not even allowed to be officially tested. Billions continue to be spent on cancer research and treatment, encouraging any, the slightest hope of research into a cure and its treatment. This only confirms the power of the pharmaceutical industry and how it threatens its immoral dealings with human health. Only expensive cancer treatments are permissible today.

Zverina JosefPatocka JanAnother interesting article about us (LN 30.4.2022) - unfortunately only in the paid section unlike others?). J.Š.

***

Twenty years ago, the work of director Miroslav Bambušek (46) began to rediscover the past. The crimes of communism, the expulsion of the Germans, and most recently the spiritual power of philosopher Jan Patočka and theologian Josef Zvěřina. What drives him into a personal and social prehistory? 

"Enemies are like a sieve in God's hands, where what is human in man is separated from what is divine in him." Joseph Zverina. With Zvěřina comes a priest who has no need for lavish ceremonies; he celebrates Mass at the lathe, at the anvil, on a pile of stones. Someone who has found meaning in the suffering that is born in the struggle for truth, against fear, violence and lies, hiding behind comfort. With Venison comes to me someone I think I've been looking for: a forgotten father, a friend, a brother whose realm is not of this world.

Benes Stalin Pravda viteziZaorane masove Hroby Geza Dunajzsky avers 2022In connection with the end of World War II in Europe in May 1945 and the massacres of the population of the liberated territories, let us remember the personality of the President of Czechoslovakia, Dr. Edvard Beneš, who actively participated in crimes against humanity. Let us not be surprised that the Communists supported the law: the President, Dr. Edvard Beneš, was responsible for the state - and its destruction.J.Š.

***

The following interview with me was broadcast on Kossuth Rádió on 2 August 2020 on the Sunday programme Without Borders on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the publication of the Benes Decrees. The reporter was Mária Haják, radio correspondent in Bratislava.

Mr. Géza Dunajszky, why did you become interested in the personality of the politician Edvard Beneš, or as many say Eduard Beneš, and what kind of person was he? What motivated you to do so?

Géza D. - When in 2007 the Slovak Parliament confirmed the validity of the Beneš Decrees, I was shocked and it gave me the need to re-examine things. Since my early childhood, I have retained certain memories of situations that are incompatible with good morals and humanity in general. In addition, I have also witnessed crimes that clearly fall into the category of war crimes. At the same time, I was constantly confronted with the propaganda that Benes and his government, and subsequently the Czech and Slovak public, considered us Hungarians and Germans to be co-responsible for the dissolution of the First Czechoslovak Republic. This aroused my interest in seeking an explanation as to how someone could be - I cannot find a better word now - such a scoundrel as to deceive all the great powers, France, England and even the United States. The only one with whom he found great understanding from the beginning was the big Slavic brother, the Soviet Union, but I have the feeling from certain sources that even there they did not trust Benes very much.

After the pandemic came a hot war, a new state of emergency. There are slogans from all sides about the need to inoculate democratic culture with the virtues of war, hatred of the enemy, conscription, intransigence. Whoever applies the principle of thinking people "whenever I accuse someone of wronging me, I find myself wronged" is considered a collaborator with evil, the difference between disinformation and opposition websites is dangerously narrowing in the eyes of the censors. As Abraham Lincoln said in 1848, "The public eye is fascinated by the attractive rainbow arching over the bloody splinter of battlefields, which will stupefy and bring destruction".

Iustitia Bohyne justice a nebeThere is a theoretical proposition that I find increasingly true. Let me state it. You won't find anything about it in law textbooks.

Law (as a system) is a product and therefore an instrument of actual social conception. The main (unwritten) function of law (actual legal practice), is to protect the social conception, as it actually is, from non-conceptual changes. If the system of law fulfils this function, then law works. If the real social conception is based on a large-scale criminal foundation, systemic violations of written law, and crypto-fascism as the tools necessary to exercise power over people, then HER legal system protects all of this primarily in consequence, not eliminates it. And if it does, then the law is working properly and not not not working (!).

Law "can only afford" to remove and address those elements in society that are superfluous and expendable to its realistic conception as it currently exists. What the written law declares is not at all relevant. It is such a misleading advertisement for the people. Only the societal (conceptual) consequences of its enforcement are relevant. Hopefully it will somehow work in someone else's mind too, in relation to ALL those "legal solutions to the current situation".