Mgr. Straka: ... In view of what I have said, I have no choice but to express my astonishment that these relatively clear conclusions, whose legal analysis could be mastered by a third-year law student, are not reflected in a completely clear acquittal four years later. Even if perhaps the court still thought that the defendant had actually done something to the victim, it could not be battery within the meaning of the Criminal Code. At most, it might be a misdemeanor of some sort, but not one that could be resolved in a criminal court. ...
***
From an ordinary misdemeanor to a criminal proceeding that has been going on for 7 years! Legal costs ing. Mark Gába's legal costs have already reached half a million crowns (his relatives are also paying for them). The names of the judges are not mentioned on the agenda (we will know them only when the verdict is published).
The presiding judges refused to publish their photographs, except for the president of the chamber, Mgr. Igor Krajdl (one of them demanded the immediate deletion of the photo - see the gesture in the photo, the other had his shirt unbuttoned and his tie loose as in a pub). After my promise not to publish, he calmed down. After such a "judicial lynching", I no longer intend to keep my promise. I have no problem with disrespecting the wishes of a judge who is not paid by the public for such crap. I apologize, but I don't know a more apt word to describe the "work" of judges. Basically, "judicial executioners" where they ruled in complete contradiction to the facts, the law, their spirit and common sense. Upon announcing that I was making an audio recording, the judge addressed me as "Mr. Shinagel" (we have never met). He has also apparently been following my years of coverage of the Ostrava "Justice Palermo". No surprise. JŠ
Read more...